Talk:2010 Crown Royal Presents the Heath Calhoun 400

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Crown Royal Presents the Heath Calhoun 400 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

2010 Crown Royal Presents the Heath Calhoun 400 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 30, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 18, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

NASCAR Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Crown Royal Presents the Heath Calhoun 400/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Derild 49 21 ☼ 01:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC) Hello, this is my first GA review so please remind me if I do anything wrong. Thanks![reply]

Ok, looking at the page now, it passes the quick-fail criteria and I will now conduct a full review. Derild 49 21 ☼ 01:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In depth review[edit]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

Only saw a typo NSD fixed

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

Free of OR, still checking rest

Conditions were clear with a high of 88 °F (31 °C), making the track potentially slippery.[14] Where in ref 14 does it say the track would become potentially slippery. Minor issue, but I don't get the concept and I also couldn't find it in the reference. Besides this it's fine.

(edit conflict)

Removed since it isn't stated by the source. ~NSD (✉ • ✐) 13:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, according to this, ref 2 is dead. Any alternative?

Didn't show up now. So I guess it was fixed. --Nascar 1996 ^{Contributions / Guestbook} 13:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) That's because I replaced it. ~NSD (✉ • ✐) 13:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, rest of the references look good so as soon as the lead is done I guess I can pass this. (A bit quick but I guess that's what happens with a well written article beforehand ;)) Derild 49 21 ☼ 13:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Looking at some of your other GA's this article is fine.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No problem, free of POV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No problem, editors working together fine.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All are free use and there are enough in the article with captions
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Ok, after going through and having fixed up the minor issues I saw this article is now a GA! Derild 49 21 ☼ 13:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous[edit]

The lead is a bit on the short side. Maybe add in a paragraph on the background section and practice. Derild 49 21 ☼ 13:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Compared to the other articles, such as 2010 Toyota/Save Mart 350, I will add a small race summary to the lead.--Nascar 1996 ^{Contributions / Guestbook} 13:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nascar 1996 ^{Contributions / Guestbook} 13:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Crown Royal Presents the Heath Calhoun 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100815005030/http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/ to http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]