Talk:2011–12 El Hierro eruption

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Spanish Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Spanish Africa work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Scientific Report Published[edit]

this report seems to cover the entire eruption pretty thoroughly. EdwardLane (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh activity[edit]

new earthquake swarm with several hundred fresh quakes, most over mag 2.0 and several mag 3+ in the last week or so. I'm expecting a fresh eruption/reactivation of the vent in the las Calmas sea. EdwardLane (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add to the article - go on, be bold! Tubney (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can be bold and write what I think has occurred including Long Period earthquakes, and so forth, but finding a wp reliable source for the info might be difficult, I can link to the IGN page with the seismograph data but it still needs interpretation before that becomes a useful reference, and there are a bunch of blog pages that look good, wired science, volcanocafe and earthquake-report but I've never been sure that those count as reliable sources (though I think those 3 are generally very reliable) and I've just not been online for any length of time to figure out what the wikipedia policy is on all that sort of stuff. You also get the Pevolca/IGN press statements but they seem slanted to political ends, so I'm loath to use them especially where they are contradicting each other even about whether or not there is a 'situation' at all in El Hierro. EdwardLane (talk) 10:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paper on the effect on wildlife[edit]

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0102354

©Geni (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011–12 El Hierro eruption. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]