Talk:2011 Sudirman Cup
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Why is this staged second straight time in China? Normally this kind competition hostings are cycled some way. 85.217.39.211 (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Number of points for win/loss in group stage[edit]
Looking at the previous (2009) Sudirman Cup, a team got 1 point for a won tie and 0 points for a loss. In the official competition regulations the number of points awarded by winning/losing a tie is not mentioned. Only that the number of won ties should determine the final standings in a group. Wouldn't it be more logical to follow the format of the 2009 Sudirman Cup wikipedia article where a win=1p and loss=0p, instead of the current win=2p and loss=1p. Xerxes53 (talk) 12:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- You are right, according to the tournamentsoftware.com site it is 1 and 0. Kante4 (talk) 12:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2011 Sudirman Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518035838/http://www.2011sudirmancup.com/node_42229.htm to http://www.2011sudirmancup.com/node_42229.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)