Talk:2012 League of Ireland Premier Division

Football: Ireland / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Irish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The League is about football clubs not holding companies[edit]

Can people stop vandalising the page and adding in rubbish about holding companies? The page is about a football league and its football clubs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.198.151.37 (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2012 League of Ireland Premier Division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links in references[edit]

I've re-applied a reverted edit that marks several references with {{dead link}}. These artices do go to the intended website, but redirect to that site's home page rather than content that's useful for verifying the claims made in the article. I poked around a bit, but I can't seem to find the original story being referenced. (Which seems odd ... maybe I'm screwing up the search some how?) The links need attention, so I think they should remain marked with maintenance tags. Per WP:DEADLINK, it's not "fine" to leave such links unattended. -- Mikeblas (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]