Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 FIFA World Cup article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 90 days

Football High‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil: Sports High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sports in Brazil task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2014, when it received 15,659,069 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 10 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Acozad.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inline link RfC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

It's clear that this is the same question that is being asked at Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup#Inline link RfC, so I'm closing this per WP:MULTI and WP:FORUMSHOP. I may close the first one too: I'm still undecided on that matter. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should the name of the host nation include an inline link to the nation's article? For example, should the first instance of the word "Brazil" be bracketed so as to provide a link to Brazil? Rowsdower45 (talk) 06:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose First this is a clear WP:OVERLINK as it's almost impossible that any fan of the sport would not know where Brazil was and it is against a WP:FOOTY WP:CONSENSUS, and exactly the same question as you asked at Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup and you are WP:FORUMSHOPping hoping you'll get your way in one location. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- A bit ironic that Brazil is an example of an OVERLINK at the documentation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per my comment at Talk:2002_FIFA_World_Cup#Inline_link_RfC. Tony (talk) 09:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The intro includes an inline link to the Americas (which encompasses a larger and more well-known area than Brazil) and FIFA World Cup, which are both sufficiently well-known and also provide users a convenient click to learn more information about these topics.Rowsdower45 (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.