Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC)

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Official Draw[edit]

When will the official draw for 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualification (AFC) start?? Andy4190

The draw will start on 30 march. Uishaki

I have question, does rank 5-29 played in the first round? would the first round consist 38 matches (Home/Away), just like in 2010 FIFA World Cup Qualification ?? Andy4190

Syria eliminated[edit]

http://sana.sy/ara/11/2011/08/19/364803.htm

Says Syria have been kicked out (and replaced by Tajikistan) because they played an ineligible player in the last round. Of, course, if could just be easier not to play matches in Syria at the moment. Nothing official from FIFA yet however. Jlsa (talk) 08:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Syria have gradually been written out of the FIFA database during the last hour. Tajikistan are now showing up as playing in Group C (for a while it listed both of them in a 5 team group), the results page now notes both matches being awarded 3–0, and Tajikistan, not Syria, are listed in the overview page of World Cup fixtures (and in the last 5 minutes also on the Asia page). Looks ominous for Syria. But, no official word from FIFA (which is like putting the cart before the horse). Jlsa (talk) 14:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More info here. It seems to contain errors (the match wouldn't be 2–0 surely, and both matches are affected, not just one). FIFA possibly waiting for the appeal mentioned. Jlsa (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uzbek Federation (here) says they are playing Tajikistan and there can be no appeal. If this counts as official then I think the updating can take place. Jlsa (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the stats for the two games (i.e. goals scored) in the games between Syria and Tajikistan be removed if the games were forfeited?

Goal Scorers and Syria[edit]

Should Syria's goals in the first round be listed in the goalscoring table since they were forfeited? There was a Tajikistan own goal, but that goal doesn't count in the score, so should that be removed? I'm not sure how to proceed. JedG (talk) 01:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the goal scorers change - just the score. The FIFA match reports don't change the goal scorers list. Jlsa (talk) 02:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australia[edit]

Shouldn't it be mentioned that Australia is the only Oceanic Team to participate in AFC qualification for the WC along with some sources when this decision was made? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.118.88.113 (talk) 02:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australia is a member of the AFC just like all the other teams competing in this tournament. Last time around it was mentioned that it was the first time they had competed in the AFC qualification since changing confederations, so it's no longer a new thing. Jlsa (talk) 02:36, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag for All Teams[edit]

I don't understand why the teams that doesn't participate to the qualification, in that case Brunei, Bhutan and Guam, don't deserve to have their flag next to the country name!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafa1985 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because they appear in a sentence, which is text. You can't "say" the flag so the flag shouldn't appear in the sentence. The other flags appear in a table (so they aren't text, they are tablulated). If you allow that here, why shouldn't you allow something like "The final of the World Cup saw

Spain defeat

Netherlands 1–0"? Jlsa (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oman/Myanmar[edit]

Is there a reference stating FIFA awarded the first leg 3-0? -Koppapa (talk) 19:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here Jlsa (talk) 00:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the match statistics say it has been awarded. But shouldn't there be news, or a reason, why it has been awarded? Fifa talks about a 2-0 after the second leg. -Koppapa (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You would hope so. There are actually 4 (or is it 5) qualifying matches where FIFA have "awarded" the result. They have not provide any reasoning - yet it would be incorrect (surely) to say the result was 2:0 when FIFA's database says 3:0 - because we link to that database results as our "source". Jlsa (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well i changed the link. 2–0 is backed by the AFC and all secondary sources. Unless there is a source at FIFA directly stating leg 1 was awarded, it shouldn't be changed again. -Koppapa (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the FIFA disciplinary committee only met (to decide such issues) on 17 February it's hardly a surprise other sources aren't over this (why would they care - most never changed the third round 2010 qualifiers involving Singapore that were changed months after the event). The AFC hasn't updated the tables for the 3rd round groups (they still have everybody on 5 games) and it's 4 days later (will you be reversing those edits too?). Why aren't you applying the same logic to the four CONCACAF match results similarly changed by the 17 February disciplinary committee meeting? It is the "FIFA" World Cup after all - and their database (and the list of match results for the FIFA World Cup) now show the match as 3:0. (And the AFC list also shows no result for Myanmar - Oman at all, but apparently that's not an issue for you) Jlsa (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's strange that FIFA doesn't openly announce those awarded matches? Those CONCACAF matches were all awarded on 17 February? Is there some kind of news with all things decided by the commitee? All i found was this: http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/organisation/bodies/news/newsid=1585615/index.html . I didn't knew of CONCACAF or the 2010 awarded matches, i thought it was a strage mess-up by FIFA. Guess it should be reverted back again, allthough i'd really like to know the reason behind the awarding. -Koppapa (talk) 10:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted. Thanks for pointing, Jlsa. Maybe someone finds out the reason, if not at FIFA maybe some Omanian site. -Koppapa (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the next matchday... ?[edit]

Is it okay to add the "on the next matchday" sections to the group matches at this point? It should be fairly straightforward to determine who needs what to advance. Avenger42 (talk) 00:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it's "shit" per User:Dr._Vicodine, so I won't bother. Avenger42 (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup qualification which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]