Talk:2014 US Open (tennis)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Li Na's points[edit]

For the editor who inserted Li Na's rankings points, don't forget she has also lost 395 points each from not playing at the Rogers Cup or Cincinnati (she was a semi-finalist at both tournaments last year).

Thanks, MasterMind5991 (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Location[edit]

"New York, New York" refers to Manhattan, which is incorrect. This is not where the event or tennis center are located. Most specifically, the city and state are Flushing, New York. However, apparently the original writer chose to be less specific and state the location as New York City, in which case it should be written as "New York City, New York". In between the two would be to state the location as "Queens, New York" or "Flushing, Queens, New York". In fact, on the Wikipedia entry for Citi Field, which is literally adjacent to this tennis center, the location is listed as "Flushing, Queens, New York City, New York". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.39.136.38 (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 US Open (tennis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]