Talk:2015 KG163

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Planet Nine?[edit]

some fanatics have been hijacking tno articles by inserting "planet nine" orbit drawings on their pages. "planet nine" is a theoretical body like vulcan, tyche or nibiru and there is no evidence, just freaky conjectures that it might exist. all speculations (sometimes bizarrely presented as "facts") that suggested it might be in a specific place according to "theories" or "models" have ended in nothing even remotely relevant found so far. please ban the trolls that are are hijacking tno articles and remove hypothetical bodies' orbits from all actual solar system bodies' articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.17.238.85 (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The current notability of extreme Transneptunian objects comes from their alignment relative to a hypothetical Planet Nine. Tom Ruen (talk) 21:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

orbital elements[edit]

I updated the orbital elements using barycentric, not sure which were being used before. Agmartin (talk) 15:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]