Talk:2015 Tour de Yorkshire

2015 Tour de Yorkshire has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 2, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal 2015 Tour de Yorkshire is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources[edit]

CN preview

Relentlessly (talk) 21:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Tour de Yorkshire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to review this! Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The following things should be adressed:

I feel that the references in the lead are not necessary, since you gave or should give the information in the article body as well and there it can be sourced.
Stage 2: intermediate sprint point I understand what you are trying to say, but it sounds confusing, since at an intermediate sprint, you also get points, so you should rephrase this.
Stage 3: effectively confirming his overall victory - That is pure speculation and should be taken out.
Stage 3: I find calling a 17-man group the peloton is stretching it a little bit. Maybe 17-man chasing group?
There are several images from the race on Commons, you should include 1 or 2 of those.

That is all that I could find. Good job so far :) Placing the article on hold. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zwerg Nase; thanks for being so quick with this! I have corrected your first four points. With the images, I've struggled. One was already included (in 2015 Tour de Yorkshire § Stage 2, and this is the only one that felt even vaguely relevant. The rest are all irrelevant (or unidentifiable) riders and I can't see where I'd fit them in. Thoughts? Relentlessly (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Relentlessly: I put in an image showing Wiggins on stage 1, I hope you don't mind. Other than that, I see no reason not to pass. Congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Super, thanks. I did wonder about that one and chose against it because you can hardly see him! But that's fine, thanks for the review. Relentlessly (talk) 12:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is certainly not ideal, but I thought it would be fair to include him, considering he was the star of the tour. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]