Talk:2016–17 Liverpool F.C. season

Football: England / Liverpool / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Liverpool task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Merseyside Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add a report of the match with Manchester City and preferably just un-protect the page so I could do it myself. 87.126.23.87 (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article.
As for the unprotection - this page has had to be protected 3 times in 2017 due to repeated vandalism - Arjayay (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add "On 19th March, Liverpool travelled to Manchester City in a crucial game for the battle for Champions league. James Milner opened the scoring from the spot in the 51st minute, though Sergio Agüero levelled at the 69th. Both Liverpool missed many chances, including a mishit by Lallana from 5 yards, but at the end the draw was a fair result." at the end of month March of the season review. Here's a source also: http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/39246699

When will it be unprotected?87.126.23.87 (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC) Arjayay (talk)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.201.94 (talk) 08:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is anyone gonna make this??? 46.47.83.110 (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - albeit reworded a little - I trust I'm not breaking some unwritten rule about waiting for the results of other matches.
46.47.83.110 The reason your request had not been answered was that you did not change the answered=y to answered=no at the top of this section. This would have re-added it to the request list, but without that, nobody knew there was anything to reconsider.
As for when will it be unprotected, the current protection - the third this year - expires at 17.33 on 23 March
Your attempt to get my attention failed because you did not sign your post at the same time as you added my name (and I'm not sure whether IP addresses can WP:Ping in any case) - Arjayay (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 84.238.174.220 (talk) 09:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Replace "and Can in the 64th with a low shot t the corner." with "and Can in the 64th minute with an inch-perfect shot which ended in Tom Heaton's lower left corner" 77.85.63.131 (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting for an answer. 95.42.19.168 (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to decide this one but "inch-perfect" seems WP:POV and I can not see that description in any of the sources. Qed237 (talk) 11:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]