Talk:2022 Singapore Grand Prix

Formula One Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

vandalized?[edit]

what is that with the grid penalties? 190.234.92.107 (talk) 15:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's been reverted. SSSB (talk) 21:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A minor mistake for the 107% Time in this article, to which I have corrected.[edit]

The official 107% time is 2:00.971, not 2:02.118.

Found this erroneous edit. 2022 Singapore Grand Prix (edited on 23:04, 1 October 2022)

Max Verstappen set the fastest lap time in Q1, not Charles Leclerc.

Wikipedia Vienna (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Safety car infringements[edit]

According to the BBC Perez fell more than ten car lengths behind during the safety car twice. Apparently he only got a warning for the first offence. Very controversial! Might be worth a mention. (78.19.153.116 (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC))[reply]

The nature of the two investigations are definitely worth a mention. But, if you read the relevant official documents (found here) you'll find that there is nothing controversial about it. He only recieved a penalty for the second one because it was a repeat offense. SSSB (talk) 07:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]