Talk:9K111 Fagot

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Spigot or Fagot[edit]

I moved this page back to 9m111 Spigot, initially thinking it was vandalism. I don't know if this is actually it's official name or not (google does return plenty of results) but every article I checked that linked to it refered to it as Spigot.

AT-4 Spigot is the NATO reporting name. 9M111 Fagot (Фагот) is the actually the Russian name for the missile/system. Since the article title is using the Russian designation then Fagot would be correct. Megapixie 04:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think NATO uses Spigot instead of Fagot O.o —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.239.143 (talk) 00:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the NATO reporting name convention - "S" names for surface to surface missiles. Vechs (talk) 20:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

9K111??[edit]

why is the only reference to this Weapons as 9K111 the title and the rest are 9M111? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow Onion (talk • contribs) 11:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muzzle velocity[edit]

In the infobox:

Muzzle velocity 80 m/s (180 mph; 290 km/h) at launch 186 m/s (420 mph; 670 km/h) in flight speed

What the heck is "muzzle velocity in flight speed"? Staszek Lem (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]