Talk:AEi Systems

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Reasons this entry should be kept:
AEi is a well established company with a customer list that includes most American aerospace companies.:
AEi is well known in the DC/DC field. The AEi WCCA Enabler set the standard for Raytheon and Dell. AEi is the only company with a library of SPICE models from all the major IC manufactures.:
Articles about companies and products are fine if they are written in an objective and unbiased style
AEiSystems (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, articles about companies still have to follow notability guidelines to be included, and generally should be made by someone outside of the company (and per your username, i'm assuming you're either an employee or owner). Articles must meet certain requirements to avoid speedy deletion, and then more stringent requirements to avoid deletion. Right now, i'd say this falls under CSD A7 for deletion as the company appears to be non notable, not promotional, and have changed the speedy deletion tag accordingly. The best way to address these concerns is to include third party external sources in the article to establish notability. If the article is deleted, for any reason, i'd recommend that you let someone outside the company create the article per conflict of intrest guidelines. To be clear as well, the article does not appear to be written in an unbiased and objective manner. Alot of the facts in the article will require citations in order to survive the deletion discussion that will most probably happen if the speedy deletion is denied. Best of luck, and thank you for your contributions. MattWT (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy removed by admin[edit]

As the reviewing administrator, I decided it did not fit the speedy deletion criterion. It does not have to prove importance to pass speedy, it just has to give some indication of it, which it does, by talking about its role in major wellknown projects. However, Matt is certainly correct that in order to be actually kept here, it needs to actually demonstrate this, via 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases). I'd advise you to add this very quickly, before it gets nominated for regular deletion.

Editing with a conflict of interest is certainly discouraged, but not impossible. For advice, see our Business FAQ and also WP:COI and our guide to writing Wikipedia articles.

Incidentally, you must continue editing under a different user name. Only individuals, not companies, can edit Wikipedia. DGG (talk) 13:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AEi Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.lsengineer.com/m1.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009054128/http://www.ema-eda.com:80/documents/PR_AEiModelLibrary%20_092007.pdf to http://www.ema-eda.com/documents/PR_AEiModelLibrary%20_092007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]