Talk:ATLAS Forward Proton Project

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Comments by IP 74.57.243.138[edit]

any idea if theres a relation with marijuana (420) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.243.138 (talk) 02:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why "notable participant"?[edit]

I doubt that the sentence about a "notable member" qualifies as Notable by WP standards, only by the standards of the popular media. In an article about a scientific experiment, only scientifically notable contributions to the experiment itself are WP-Notable. Layzeeboi (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was a bit biased. I've reduced that. I strongly suspect that there are a couple of other co-authors with articles, and that the sentence that stands now can be extended a little. Uncle G (talk) 12:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FP420 experiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090727213454/http://www.fp420.com/ to http://www.fp420.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090727213454/http://www.fp420.com/ to http://www.fp420.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

indecency[edit]

"indecent angle" is an apparent error for "incident angle" in one of the sources, which I have corrected. It was rather amusing. Uncle G (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]