Talk:Achkan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. TreyGeek (talk) 01:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

In the previous source Achkan is completely associated with sherwani and the whole book is written correlating the two and to incorporate the cultural aspects of india at that time. It completely ignores the origin and evolution of the dress.But we know for a fact, the history of Achkan predates to millennium back thanks to the various sculpture and arts we are left with today. It makes no sense to not talk about its actual origin and what it has developed from. 103.81.213.133 (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit you removed content supported by reliable sources. You have added images with quotes not supported by any reliable sources. This is clearly WP:OR, So I am reverting your edit Hu741f4 (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]