Talk:Across the Black Soil Plains

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Across the Black Soil Plains is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move 6 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 23:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Across the black soil plains → Across the Black Soil Plains
Anzac, the landing 1915 → Anzac, the Landing 1915
Anzacs bathing → Anzacs Bathing
Pan is dead (still life) → Pan Is Dead (Still Life) -- it should be noted that "(Still Life)" is not a Wikipedia parenthetical qualifier, but part of the work's name
A sergeant of the Light Horse → A Sergeant of the Light Horse
The sonnet (Lambert) → The Sonnet (Lambert) or, alternatively, simply The Sonnet
Weighing the fleece → Weighing the Fleece

– These seven nominations were considered for separate submissions, but were bundled into a single nomination because they represent titles of works by the same artist under Category:Paintings by George Washington Lambert. The argument that the lowercase form should be retained since it represents the original title of the work did not prevail in a similar 2013 discussion at Talk:A Boy Was Born#Requested move (the 1934 composition was originally referenced as A Boy was Born). The counter-argument is that in earlier eras orthography was not standardized and initial caps were used in a random and inconsistent fashion, but that for Wikipedia purposes, MOS:CT prevails. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have read MOS:CAPTITLES and WP:NCCAPS (advocates of maximal capitalisation); In 2021 there is so much overcapitalisation which serve no validity in a typewritten and electronic world. Italics or quotes succinctly identify a works. Despite the Wiki-standards, Lambert titled his works as he felt they should, capitalising only proper nouns ('When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.').—Q8682 (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support all of these are about specific paintings not a type of painting so should be in title case. I might not capitalize "is" but per Talk:Hearts Are Trumps#Requested move 4 December 2020 it appears it should be. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Follow WP style guidelines, which specify capping words in work titles. Dicklyon (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.