Talk:Adam Vaughan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Haha, this resumé seems a little like a vanity page, doesn't it? I agree Mr. Vaughan is notable, however this seems more like a campaign bid than an informative wikipedia article. Pyrotix 22:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It truly is. Now his opponent wants a vanity page. Since I'm from Toronto, I'll see if any of this can be verified. --Zeizmic 19:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found something notable, so this page should stay. --Zeizmic 20:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC) Removed vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinsenior (talkcontribs) 16:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

added his lawsuit[edit]

So I added more dirt on this guy, it's all verifiable and backed up by media reports. He needs to be held accountable for destroying that bar. Takethemdown (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition clearly shows that you are biased against the subject. There are places for such comments but Wikipedia is not one of them. Please review WP:NOTSOAPBOX before adding such material again. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 19:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I read it. maybe you can now read about how wikipedia is NOT CENSORED. I saw a reliable source in the media showing a notable event about a public, notable person and I added it. Do you work for the guy or something? Takethemdown (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE I reworded it now. Stop censoring it or you will be banned forever.Takethemdown (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reference you gave said nothing about him being in the bar, drinking too much or breaking the bar up. Continuing to add information in a non neutral manner like you have done may result in your editing privileges being removed. NtheP (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, all it says now is that there was a lawsuit. Even you can't say with a straight face that isn't in the article. Stop protecting the guy, he made his bed now he can lie in itTakethemdown (talk) 19:18, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Which is better, so why didn't you keep it this simple first time round instead of putting allegations in that weren't supported by the reference? NtheP (talk) 19:23, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adam Vaughan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adam Vaughan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]