Talk:Adil Rashid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed text[edit]

I took this out:

So far Rashid has taken a wicket in every innings of the 2007 County Championship season.

Including the match against Worcestershire that finished today,[1] that makes eight innings. Taking a wicket in eight successive innings isn't close to being remarkable. For example, Darren Gough, the first player I looked up, took at least one in more than 20 successive first-class innings at the end of 2003 and first part of 2004. Loganberry (Talk) 14:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


No probs, I just thought it was remarkable because he's an all-rounder, spinner and its his first full season. Joe p15 11:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I do find it quite interesting, but I don't think it can really be considered encyclopedically notable. Now, if he takes a wicket in every innings all season, that would be a different story! Loganberry (Talk) 15:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some small vandalism, but the person removed the template spreadsheet thing (look at the pre-vandalism edits if this is too vague) and the data therein. I don't have the time or the knowledge to re-add this.

Untitled[edit]

It says he was born in Bangladesh, but then says he is of Pakistani rather than Bangladeshi heritage! It also says he was the 3rd "Yorkshire born" Asian, when he was born in Bangladesh!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.254.201.36 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 30 June 2015‎ (UTC---

Yorkshire born Asian[edit]

Is this term really appropriate? He's English and plays for England yet is referred to as an "Asian" in this phrase. The article later says his family moved to the UK in the 1960s, about 20 years before he was born, so that hardly seems accurate.

It also seems an obscure thing to point out in the article that he's "only the third Yorkshire born Asian to play for Yorkshire". A bit like saying someone is only the third Norfolk born Scotsman to play football for Norwich City - i.e. it's difficult to see why this is particularly relevant or noteworthy. Lewdswap (talk) 10:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Adil Rashid/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Picture required
  2. Could do with breaking up into sections
Keith D 09:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 09:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Adil Rashid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Adil Rashid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adil_Rashid&oldid=1212399367"