Talk:Affliction: Day of Reckoning

I was thinking maybe there should be a temporary section of rumored/possible participants section, including the Ortiz/Babalu bout and the Rizzo/Buentello bout. ~Tkwon (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WAMMA rankings[edit]

Is there a need to mention WAMMA's ranking of every fighter? Rankings are subjective, and it doesn't really add much to the article. --aktsu ^(t / c) 09:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll move the rankings from the prose to the matchup detail. But it is notable, WAMMA is the only independent sanctioning body in MMA. If it was a boxing match that had four or five matchups between top-15 ranked IBF or WBA boxers, that would be notable, but it never happens. This card has more matchups between ranked opponents than any other card except maybe the first Affliction card.--2008Olympian^chitchat 10:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the WAMMA rankings are speculative at best. WAMMA posted their new rankings for January and have moved Arlovski to #1 even though he has not fought since the last rankings. This appears self serving to hype the match-up with Fedor to protect their WAMMA belt and make it look legitimate somehow. How convenient, regardless of who wins the fight the winner gets the WAMMA belt and fights for Affliction. This is exactly what corrupted boxing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.119.110 (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC) I don't believe the rankings have any merit what so ever until such time as they are recognized by a few legitimate organizations as it is pretty obvious WAMMA is not impartial.[reply]

good point; plus having a fighter be #4 when he's only had 3 fights is a little ridiculous... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.119.110 (talk) 19:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the new WAMMA rankings had the fighters on this card moving down. Sokoudjou went from #14 to unranked, Babalu went from #12 to #15, and Nogueira went from #10 to #12. Only Arlovski and Lindland moved up one spot each. The fact taht Affliction and WAMMA are linked is why these ratings are relevant to this article.--2008Olympian^chitchat 08:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Affliction: Day of Reckoning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]