Talk:Ahmad Raza Khan Kasuri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

In the infamous talk show, Kasuri claimed that he was the only one to go to Dhaka in '71 for the session of Parliament that never was. Is this true? If so, it needs to be mentioned and documented.

--iFaqeer 11:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Text removed from article due to POV[edit]

Heads of Kasurites have bowed down because of nefarious language used by Ahamd Raza Khan Advocate in "The Great Debate" on GEO TV at 1905hrs at GEO TV on September 23, 2007. The last portion of the first episode of the programme "The Great Debate" shows Pakistani Public the ugly face of the Presidential Camp.
Pakistani & International media should avoid using word "Kasuri" with the name of Ahmad Raza Khan Advocate. Once in a meeting with a reknowned Pakistani American Dr. Muhammad Amanullah Khan - A Cancer Therapist, when asked from Dr. Amanullah Khan why he does not use word Kasuri with his name.? He replied instantly, I don't need so, "it is needed by those who have torn off their relation with their mother land need the same, I am Amanullah Khan and whole of Kasur knows me." Chairman Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission Dr. Muneer Ahmad Khan also belong to Kasur and don't need Kasuri to be added to his name as lot of Kasurites know that he is originally from Kasur.
Ahmad Raza Khan Advocate is the person who has been involved in filing a case against an old employee of his own father Muhammad Ahmad Khan, to whom Muhammad Ahmad Khan donated a plot on about one canal near Melad Gate, KASUR. Ahmad Raza Khan was pleading the case on the basis that his father was insane when he donated plot to his employee.
It is reiterated that suffix "Kasuri" may please be removed from name of Ahmad Raza Khan. By doing that media personnel are teasing Kasurites.
On September 24, 2007 in the morning when Kasuri reached in front of Supreme Court for a case hearing, Khurshid Ahmad, a lawyer who belongs to NWFP province, threw black color upon his face. Lawyer Khurshid told media that he did it because Kasuri was continuously abusing the lawyers community.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kasuri in Black.jpg[edit]

Image:Kasuri in Black.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kasuri in Black.jpg[edit]

Image:Kasuri in Black.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ahmad Raza Khan Kasuri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article Split[edit]

This article should be split, as the current article makes sparse mention of the living figure that it is meant to describe and instead focuses mainly on the subject's father. I believe that most internal redirects to this article are from the page on Zia-ul-Haq (apologies for the lack of a direct hyperlink, I'm rather new at this) and the death sentence he pronounced on Zulfikar Ali Bhutto as a result of the ostensible murder of the aforementioned subject's father. It seems prudent to create a separate page for the deceased, while his son (the listed subject of the current article) should be placed under the "Related Articles" section of Nawab Mohammad Ahmad Kasuri. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.66.60.169 (talk) 10:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarised from Newspaper article[edit]

The text from "On November 11, 1974..." till "...bad governance and injustice." appears to have been directly lifted from an article published by Dawn newspaper.

Hulleye (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]