This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
The question whether KLM uk should be merged into AirUK is dicussed here.--FoxyOrange (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like it was put into archives too soon so this 3 year old discussion is not concluded. It should be restarted here.
No, it should be the other way round as KLM uk was the last surviving airline. In other cases, American Airways became American Airlines and the Wikipedia article is American Airlines. Therefore, I start the modified proposal, Air UK merged into KLM uk - Yes, merge this way. Usernamen1 (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: AirUK has a sufficiently long and involved history that having a separate page. It is not necessary to always merge pages following aquisitions. For example, AirUK itself was formed from (amongst others) British Island Airways and Air Anglia, both of which still have independent pages. Klbrain (talk) 12:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
