Talk:Airbus Corporate Jets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I improved the text for the A380 as the previous entry did not make much sense, but I did not appreciate being reverted with the comment If you think its badly written, improve it, but do not remove cited statements. as I had re-written it and the cited references were not particularly relevant. Although note that the references used have nothing to do with the Prestige. I replaced This extraordinary large jet has been currently ordered just once with One executive variant of the Airbus A380 has been ordered. No woffle just a plain factual statement. The space.com reference quotes the number ordered . It has two full decks in the widest cabin as standard, and as a unique feature even the cargo-deck is high enough to be partly usable as a third deck. which I replaced with the multi-deck configuration allows a number of different VIP configurations to be fitted. The first quote is based on the references which describe the standard A380 not the prestige. My change was to make a relevant comment on the prestige. The Flying Palace quote really needs a more official reference and it not really appropriate for a section header. Note that WP:HEAD advises against using links in headers. Your comments welcome MilborneOne (talk) 12:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK: First sentence changed.
  • "the multi-deck configuration" is vague: It has 2 fully usable decks and the cargo deck is partly usable.
  • Flying Palace: Look at google, there are lots of references stating "Flying Palace". It is mentioned that this is not the official name. Like "Jumbo-Jet" for the 747, you will not find this in a official list. But in the Wikipedia-article.
  • Most headers changed. Feel free to add the link in the text, but the link is important. Wispanow (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Airbus Corporate Jets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]