Talk:Albification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

21:38, 5 February 2015‎ Gorobay talk contribs‎ 42 bytes +42‎ Gorobay moved page Albification (Sons of Anarchy) to Albification: unnecessary disambiguation thank

Requested move 7 September 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



AlbificationAlbification (Sons of Anarchy) – restore, maybe the editor who moved it in good faith doesn't know what albification means, but this TV episode is not the primary meaning of albification, redirect to whitening. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. bd2412 T 16:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The whitening DAB page currently contains no mention of ablification. If this is the only encyclopedic topic that could be referred to as such, it should be left alone.Nohomersryan (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Nohomersryan. According to wiktionary, wikt:albification is an obsolete term for whitening. It therefore would seem to be a very unlikely search term for a reader looking for information about Key whitening, Racial whitening, Skin whitening, or any of the other topics listed at Whitening. The first 2 pages of google results for 'albification' are all either about the TV episode or dictionary definitions. Colin M (talk) 20:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of course if you consult entertainment search you will get entertainment. But in books albification means albification, not surprisingly. It will not hurt Sons of Anarchy fans to have (Sons of Anarchy) restored on the article title. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, once again, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 22:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the aboves. Calidum 14:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.