Talk:Alevi history

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Shi'a Islam

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Dawoodi Bohra#Intra-Bohra schisms|Other Bohras]] The anchor (#Intra-Bohra schisms) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

untitled comments[edit]

KIZILBAS OR ALEVI'S ARE PART OF THE MUSLIM OR ISLAMIC FAITH. **Unsubstantiated remarks

THESE GROUPS POTRAY THEMSELVES AS A BRANCH OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH BECAUSE OF INSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS SUPPORT TO THE SUNNI-HANEFI SECT IN TURKEY.

THE KIZILBAS OR ALEVI GROUP HAVE FACED MANY ATROCITIES IN OTTOMAN AND THE PRESENT DAY TURKISH REPUBLIC BECAUSE OF THEIR FAITH AND WAY OF LIFE.

THEY ARE IDENTIFIED BY MANY INTELLECTUALS IN TURKEY AS THE ONLY TRULY TURKISH (CULTURALLY AND ETHNICALLY) IN TURKEY.

IT IS WRONG TO PERCEVE THIS GROUP AS A BRANCH OF ISLAM. **Unsubstantiated remarks (They are the followers of Ismail I of Safaviyya i. e. belong to the same islamic tariqa 68.100.172.139 (talk) 15:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

THEY ARE IDENTIFIED AS MUSLIMS BECAUSE THEY LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHERE MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION IS MUSLIM AND ADHERENT TO THE RELIGION OF ISLAM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.28.71 (talk) 21:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The relation between Kurdish (Dimli) people and Alevi should at least be mentioned. Alevi are sometimes considered to be a "people" and Qizilbash are also identified by some as a religion! I don't pretend to have the expertise to sort this out, but someone who does should discuss the claims. [[Mewnews (talk) 00:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

Kurds are mentioned eleven times in the article. It also touches on several aspects of Alevi identity (i.e. are they an ethnic group, are they a religious denomination, etc). Do expand or clarify, if you think it's important. Q·L·1968 ☿ 11:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed "with most still having red hair in their gene pools." from the part

"After the Kızılbaş lost their power in Anatolia, they are assumed to have merged into the Anatolian Alevis. Kurdish Alevis are sometimes still called Kızılbaş. Even as far east as Afghanistan and Pakistan, many Shias have "Qizilbash" as their family names, with most still having red hair in their gene pools"

Qizilbash (Redheads) refers to the headgears they wore,not their haircolor as is also said in this sentence "In the early 16th century, a militant ghulat Shia order emerged, called Kızılbaş or 'Redheads' after their distinctive headgear"

I have never heard of a prevalence of red hair among qizilbashi/alevis. I think someone added this later as a joke?Ibrahim4048 (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Massacres[edit]

They should be placed to a GENERAL PERSECUTION page together with OTTOMANS 68.100.172.139 (talk) 15:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

For current position in Turkey [1] Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alevi history. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]