Talk:All India Kashmiri Samaj

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the All India Kashmiri Samaj article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 1 April 2013 by reviewer You Can Act Like A Man (talk · contribs).

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Comment[edit]

"Main objectives" section needs sourcing.
You use the word "fighting", which seems to be inappropriate unless they have actually been engaged in warfare/terrorism/riots on a significant scale - perhaps replace with "campaigning"?
A wikilink is screwed up
External links goes at the end (although in this instance it is dead anyway)
Please read WP:OVERLINK yet again
Please read WP:MOSHEAD. You do not need to say "of the AIKS" in headings
"proving timely and adequate relief " - I think that you mean "providing" but in any event this is your WP:POV rather than what the source says. And the source is pretty poor
Are you sure that it is not "All-India"
The first mention of "All India Kashmiri Samaj" (ie:the opening sentence) should be bolded per WP:MOS - Sitush (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments were of much help and let me get to improving it before I submit it. My question is about its notability. Agree that some sources aren't top quality but believe that can be used in the article. -Ambar (talk) 10:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]