Talk:Aluminium-based nanogalvanic alloys
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
What is this[edit]
This article sounds like a press release promoting the research, without telling us what this material is. What is the composition of the alloys? How is is different to aluminum powder? PS the Wikipedia standard for technical articles is to spell aluminium with the extra "i" as per the IUPAC standard. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- More details on the composition has been added and the layout has been rearranged accordingly. The extra "i" has been added to aluminium except to the page header which I imagine needs to be moved to include the "i." Epark251 (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your improvements. It still has press release qualities by including speculation of use.. I have moved the page to match, and left a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Similar edit history on duplicate article is suspicious[edit]
Aluminum_based_nanogalvanic_alloys appears to be a duplicate article with different wording. Most of the edits are made by the same editors of this article, on the same day, suggesting they intentionally created two pages to avoid a take-down or something.
Help me REVEAL...[edit]
Aluminium expert? ¡Please HELP! I am trying to prepare an article based on the REVEAL model of a large tank of aluminium pellets for Seasonal thermal energy storage) combined with cogeneration and district heating I ask you please to come and play in my sandbox = edit, mess it about and comment on its talk page – thanks and salutations Timpo (talk) 09:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Aluminum based nanogalvanic alloys into Aluminium-based nanogalvanic alloys[edit]
These cover the same content Mason (talk) 05:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Graeme Bartlett as you seem to have at least engaged with one of the page creators Mason (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- user:Epark251 created both, so I think a merge is non-controversial. I will check content of each page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I copied in the content of the sections. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- user:Epark251 created both, so I think a merge is non-controversial. I will check content of each page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)