Talk:Amanda Williams (judge)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Women Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States courts and judges

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because... it contains cited information from a nationally broadcast, Peabody Award winning, radio program known for fair investigative reporting. Libel and defamation include much more that mere negative content. I believe Judge Williams' actions are reported, not editorialized upon. Please distinguish reporting of negative actions (e.g. Judge Williams' sentencing practices - admittedly difficult to portray as positive) from negative editorializing (e.g. someone claiming Judge Williams did something she did not, or that her actions had unproven adverse consequences - something that is NOT currently an issue on this page). "Disparagement" may not be pretty, but it certainly shouldn't be muted due to false claims of legal issues. Thank you.--63.85.45.130 (talk) 20:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be "speedily deleted" because it does not meet the speedy deletion criteria. As stated on Wiki the criteria for speedy deletion is "a page that serves no purpose but to disparage or threaten its subject or some other entity." Examples of such are legal threats, or an article about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the history to revert to.

The page does not include any threatening material. It does critique the judge. However, it is not unsourced (a requirement for soemthing being speedily deleted simply because of its "tone.") This page is sourced. There are a series of sources including This American Life. If you listen to the referenced broadcast you will see that the broadcast is also sourced.

I am guessing the only reason someone is trying to delete it is that it links to her law school. Something the law school probably does not love. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.85.45.130 (talk) 21:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article failed speedy delete as an attack page because although entirely negative in tone, it does have sources. However, the article gives undue weight to the subject's sentencing policies and needs to be better balanced. I have added an {{NPOV}} tag. User 63.85.45.130, your statement "I am guessing the only reason someone is trying to delete it is..." does not demonstrate good faith on your part. It's never a good idea to claim the ability to read another editor's mind. --CliffC (talk) 01:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]