Talk:Amar Chitra Katha

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: World Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by World comics work group.

Untitled[edit]

I'm not sure the list of issues is necessary.

Those who find one necessary can find it at List of Amar Chitra Katha comics. NRPanikker (talk) 02:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Acklogo.gif[edit]

Image:Acklogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class Assesment required[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Hiding T 10:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please restore this revision. The "Cultural significance" section is completely unsourced and suffers from a rather informal tone. 134.154.38.62 (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

While you are right that the section is unsourced, I'm reluctant to make the edit given the fact that you are an IP sock of a blocked user. But I'll leave this open for someone else to look into. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done (talk page watcher) see being an uninvolved user in the SPI case, I am making the changes as I myself felt the section is neither correctly written nor sourced. Its tone is also not appropriate. Thanks VarunFEB2003 (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No source for Tinkle's Facebook[edit]

No source is given for the number of people that follow Tinkle. In addition, no source is given for "purely organic reach". — Preceding unsigned comment added by X5163x (talk • contribs) 03:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please elaborate a bit ? AnadiDoD (talk) 07:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section needs overhaul let's discuss[edit]

The criticism section is overly outdated and needs updation most of the issues discussed as criticism have been addressed as mentioned the response section. There is no need to detail these outdated issues but should be trimmed to better address the present scenario. AnM2002 (talk) 06:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]