Talk:Ambato, Ecuador

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Translation[edit]

Requested move[edit]

Ambato, EcuadorAmbato — San Juan de Ambato is it's major use for the name Ambato, and solely stand as it's name in major references towards this city. Althought it's disambiguation has others, most except one don't exist. — Blupper92 (talk) 00:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support -- The only thing that is referred to by Ecuadoreans when they say "Ambato" is the city which is the canton seat. If they're referring to the canton, it's always given as "Canton de Ambato." Equally, just as nobody uses the full name of the city of Quito, for example, nobody calls this city "San Juan de Ambato" --The lifted lorax (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- I support this as well. Having lived in Ambato in for two years, I never once heard someone call the city by the name "San Juan de Ambato," only "Ambato." According to Wikipedia's naming conventions, I would argue that if Ecuadorians use the name "Ambato," there is surely much less chance that non-Ecuadorian English speakers will identify more readily with the name "San Juan de Ambato" as the article title. Newcastle24743 (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

ReferencesI specifically edited the "Montalvo Park" section to quote the El Comercio, the main Quito paper which was the source for the most recent article on the $450,000 renovation. I also added a reference for the date of the announcement of the Festival of Fruits and Flowers which I found in a government tourism publication. I have a lot of reservations about translating the page from Spanish because of the lack of sources it cites. Newcastle24743 (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Created an inbox based on Infobox Settlement template that I found for a similar article on Cuenca, Ecuador. I also contributed two more citations in an ongoing effort to clean up this particular page. The citations are from well-known geographical dictionaries. Newcastle24743 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NeighborhoodsBeen doing some significant work translating information from the municipal website of Ambato (http://www.ambato.gov.ec/sitio2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=93) particularly about the neighborhoods and attractions located in Ambato. This is good, verifiable information, especially as Ambato has recently updated their website. Newcastle24743 (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parque-Montalvo-Ambato-5198A.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Parque-Montalvo-Ambato-5198A.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:02, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ambato, Ecuador. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]