Talk:America Football Club (Rio de Janeiro)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on America Football Club (RJ). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on America Football Club (RJ). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 December 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. The consensus shows support for "America Football Club (Rio de Janeiro)" as a more appropriate name. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane talk 03:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



America Football Club (RJ)America Football Club (Rio de Janeiro) – moving to official name with disambiguator spelt in full Hack (talk) 11:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC) --Relisting.MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 16:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. Wouldn't have a clue what RJ meant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Not only is this the standard way of dabbing clubs on enWiki per América Football Club, I believe this is also the standard way that clubs are distinguished from each other in Brazil (it certainly is from my memories of Football Manager - not that that necessarily means anything), hence why the official website is america-rj.com.br and RSSSF refers to them as America (RJ). Fenix down (talk) 15:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Fenix down (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - this is standard disambiguator for Brazilian clubs. GiantSnowman 19:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Very interesting. It seems that these clubs officially use a similar disambiguation technique to Wikipedia, but with not quite the same conventions. So what looks like a parenthetical disambiguation is actually, from our point of view, instead a common name. Andrewa (talk) 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The link provided above for "official site" is dead, but the current official site seems to be at http://www.americario.com.br/... clearly this web address uses "rio" as the disambiguator, meaning that the "RJ" is not uniformly applied. Far better and more WP:RECOGNIZABLE for us to spell out the name of the city, then anyone who looks will know what this is.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. On reflection, I don't think we can allow the current article name. To our readers, this looks like the Wikipedia parenthetical disambiguation convention, which it is not. As has been pointed out, we would not use the RJ disambiguator, as it is unrecognisable. All very confusing to the reader. It may be that we need to tweak WP:AT and/or WP:DAB to cover such cases, but meantime, the action with this article is clear (under WP:IAR if necessary): We use the more concise but ambiguous common name, and disambiguate it according to our own conventions, as proposed. This should be a precedent for other clubs at present (seemingly) disambiguated (RJ). Their official names do not take precedence over our naming policy. Andrewa (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It would affect lots of article i think, the CBF use RJ, SP, RS commonly. Matthew_hk tc 17:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on America Football Club (Rio de Janeiro). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on America Football Club (Rio de Janeiro). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]