Talk:Amy Winehouse/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –Chase (talk) 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, User:FD, when nominating a GAN, please place {{subst:GAN}} at the top of the article's talk page.

With that being said, I will have to quick-fail this article per criterion 3 at WP:RGA#First things to look for: "There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{fact}}, {{clarifyme}}, or similar tags." {{POV}} was the first thing I saw upon looking at the article, and just by scanning the table of contents, I'm not surprised. I think User:Robofish said it best here. The majority of this is about Winehouse's personal life, which is totally unacceptable for a musician article. –Chase (talk) 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, this review may have made it seem as if I only scanned the TOC, but I did indeed look through the article, though briefly as the undue weight towards Winehouse's personal life and controversies was rather obvious. –Chase (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]