Talk:Amy Wyatt/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 07:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Not much concerns here. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
All such aspects have been covered.ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Fine here. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU^IND 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail: