Talk:Ancillary Justice

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Allen review[edit]

Why is Nina Allen's review given any importance? This appears to reference a posting from a little-read blog from a largely unsuccessful author - the archived review shills for her own short-story writing near the end. I wouldn't be surprised if the addition of this review was by Ms Allen herself trying to get a little attention. Can this review be removed? 50.186.198.74 (talk) 08:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was added by me, the article's author, who isn't Ms. Allen or associated with her. I thought it appropriate to include at least one critical voice, in view of our overall neutrality policy, WP:NPOV. However, this may indeed give a minority viewpoint excessive weight. What do other editors think? Sandstein 10:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV doesn't mean that all opinions need to be equal and opposing, just that the article should fairly reflect opinions. Is there are notable negative commentaries they should be added, but all reviews need to abide by the rules of WP:RS Ashmoo (talk) 12:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ancillary Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321212448/http://www.strangehorizons.com/2014/20141110/commands-f.shtml to http://www.strangehorizons.com/2014/20141110/commands-f.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.npr.org/2013/10/08/228508903/a-skillfully-composed-space-opera-in-ancillary-justice
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151019000717/http://www.bsfs.org/CCA/CC32%20Finalists.pdf to http://www.bsfs.org/CCA/CC32%20Finalists.pdf/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sad puppies[edit]

It could be mentioned that this novel winning awards was apparently one of the things that inspired the so-called "Sad puppies"... -- AnonMoos (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They Sink And Are Vanished Away[edit]

Wondering if this should be cited as a prequel? Available on on the author’s website: https://annleckie.com/abyss.html 96.236.211.151 (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]