Talk:Angela of Foligno

Untitled

What was her sin? I wonder how bad it was.--Sonjaaa 19:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Saint?

Is she a saint? Should she be distinguished from Saint Angela? WLU (talk) 16:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

NOT incorrupt

No, she was never canonized. This article correctly identifies her as "Blessed."

However, I just removed a reference to her body being incorrupt--it is NOT!!! Angela of Foligno's remains are enclosed in a hollow statue (made of polished wood or ceramic or something similar). I was just there a couple of weeks ago, after reading this entry, and searched the entire church for any reference to Blessed Angela being incorrupt--there is absolutely nothing. I examined the statue closely from only a few feet away, and what you see is DEFINITELY a statue, not Angela herself! Cathy9999 (talk) 12:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violation

See The Good because it is coped from a copyright expired source.

See The Bad because it is copied from text still under copyright.

I have replaced the Bad with the Ugly (text copied from the copyright expired source). -- PBS (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angela of Foligno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131014181152/http://franwomen.sbu.edu/franwomen/woman_display.aspx?WID=76&PID=8&Sort=A to http://franwomen.sbu.edu/franwomen/woman_display.aspx?WID=76&PID=8&Sort=A

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angela of Foligno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222054949/http://stfrancis.clas.asu.edu/article/angela-foligno-0 to http://stfrancis.clas.asu.edu/article/angela-foligno-0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)