Talk:Angola–South Africa relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:Coat of arms of South Africa.svg[edit]

The image File:Coat of arms of South Africa.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current Tensions are not addressed.[edit]

In the 2000s section of this article, it mentions the visit from President Zuma and his delegation. What is not mentioned, is that since this visit, one of the main objectives, which was to eliminate the need for either side to apply for an ordinary/tourist visa has not be acheived to date. The Angolan government had first delayed this process when they had made the recent changes to their constitution. More recently, there has been no progress in this regard.

As a dual Brazilian/South African National, I can say that the presence of South Africans in Angola is quite limited in comparison to other CPLP (Portuguese-speaking) countries such as Portugal or Brazil, even though South Africa is a fellow SADC member and has a closer physical proximity to Angola. There are many South African companies that come to Angola, but those who are able to stay and prosper is very limited (one example is Group 5 construction who left in the middle of a large project due to complications). It is possible that language can be an influencing factor, as well as stark differences in procedural norms that are common to former Portuguese colonies. I have placed this in the discussion section as I have not cited any sources, but hopefully others' input can help in this regard and it can be added to the main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.205.42.175 (talk) 11:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Angola–South Africa relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angola–South Africa relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angola–South Africa relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]