Talk:Anita Blake mythology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion[edit]

150, could you explain your deletion? As it stands, I'm inclined to revert, but I'd like to address your concern if I can. Thanks, TheronJ 14:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too long[edit]

Uggh. The mythology page is too long and getting longer, and the table of contents now runs six levels deep. We should probably break it up, but there are a truckload of inbound links all over the novel and character pages. I'll think about whether there's an automated way to fix the links. TheronJ 14:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Looking at it, I would say that ideally it could do with being split into about four separate articles: vampires, shapeshifters, other supernatural creatures and humans. That would seem to be the most logical division and would probably make it more user friendly too in some ways, because it is a long article to read. Silverthorn 16:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'll give it a shot this weekend, particularly if autowikibrowser can fix the links. TheronJ 17:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Vampires information has been moved to a separate article Silverthorn 10:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Shapeshifters information has also been moved. Silverthorn 10:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Humans information has also been moved as it too seemed long enough to justify its own article Silverthorn 09:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quetzalcoatl[edit]

We learn quite a bit about Quetzalcoatls and a little of dragons in general on page 544 of Obsidian Butterfly. I'm going to write up a paragraph or so and stick it uder 'Dragons,' unless anyone has any objections. Anakalypsis 03:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Necromancers[edit]

One area of mythology that is missing is that of Necromancers. Necromancers, particularly Anita Blake as a Necromancer, play a significant role in the overall series story arc and in the Mother of All Darkness story arc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveras (talkcontribs) 15:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Anitaverse"?[edit]

So this is a word now, is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.77.146 (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]