Talk:Ann Banfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:BIO[edit]

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Rachgia (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — 72.75.82.202 (talk) 03:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a current student at the University of California Berkeley and am currently taking Ann Banfield's class. She is teaching Joyce and her knowledge on the subject of "free indirect" is legit. By the way, she hates this term and would rather call it "Represented Speech" because she thinks it is more clear. Not sure if I have the time to interview her for a bio. They keep me busy at school. Mhyst1 (talk) 05:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

notable per guggenheim Pohick2 (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A Guggenheim Fellowship by itself is not that notable (although it is apparently sufficient in itself to satisfy WP:ACADEMIC), or else there would be a Template and a Category for collecting recipients ... besides, there is no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, because the other refs are just "confirmation of employment" from the subject's employer, i.e., they are not independent of the subject. Happy Editing! — 71.166.147.78 (talk · contribs) 14:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ann Banfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ann_Banfield&oldid=1199462985"