Talk:Anti-genre

Calling all Nietzsche scholars[edit]

Looking for a Nietzsche scholar to collaborate on the Nietzsche section of this article. Thanks. -- Contributions/Skychildandsonofthesun SKY _child 14:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry[edit]

still working on the Literature section. It is very difficult to speak with authority about figures as important as Nietzsche and Dostoyevsky, especially trying to artificially fit them into an anachronism like anti-genre. Surely they would both object. The question I still am still working with however is whether or not this legitimately fits under the Anti-Genre article heading. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated here in the talk section. --99.232.166.201 (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the long term however it would be good to add a few more Sections (Examples in Visual Arts, Examples in Cinema, etc.) as well as populate the music, literature section with even more examples.

Also, I'm open to suggestions for what else to add / change. Please engage me here.

Thanks

--Skychildandsonofthesun (talk) 16:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Computer Science[edit]

An infinite loop is not a fatal error. An operating system, for example, is essentially an infinite loop until you tell it to turn off. Fatal errors usually result in a program crashing, not looping forever. When viewed as as logical statement rather than an artistic perspective, the 'Rule of Dada' does not apply to Anti-genre art. Trivially, 4′33″ follows the rule 'Don't play any instruments.'. "Ceci n'est pas une pipe" follows the rule 'Say that the image of a thing is not the thing.'. So computer logic is not an effective lens for examining the tenets of Dadaism. With that in mind, the Computer Science section should probably be deleted as irrelevant and misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.1.129.26 (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]