Talk:Anton Mussert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mussert and the SS[edit]

I think the statement that Mussert formed an SS unit is untrue, because he disliked the SS. The SS corps was probably created by his more radical pro-German opponents in the party like Rost van Tonningen/Meinoud Rost van Tonningen. It may be sourced to a reputable English language source, but I tend to distrust such sources. I read in an excellent Dutch biography that he oppposed the creation of SS volunteer corpses. Andries 16:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A quote from the Dutch article nl:Meinoud Rost van Tonningen to support my view from "In the NSB becoming a member of the Waffen-SS was in the beginning seen as high treason/Bij de NSB gold toetreden tot de Waffen-SS aanvankelijk nog als landverraad." Andries 08:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the text according to Musserts biography by Jan Meyers: Mussert, een politiek leven, Amsterdam, 1984, ISBN 90-295-3113-4.--Willem Huberts 20:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that is the excellent biography from which I remembered that the truth was somewhat more complicated. The only problem with this biography is that it is in Dutch language. So excerpts used for this article have to be translated to maintain verifiability which is tedious and quite unnecessary, because there is not exactly a scarcity of Dutch language contributors to the English language Wikipedia. Andries 20:52, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some information is sourced to Harry Mulisch' novel[edit]

A novel (The Assault/De aanslag) is not a good source for this article. Andries 17:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Anton Mussert.jpg[edit]

Image:Anton Mussert.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch version is far more nuanced[edit]

The problem is, I guess, that there is no balanced well-researched biography in English language. I have not read the references in English language, but it is my experience that English language books about Dutch WWII subjects tend to be simplistic. Andries (talk) 11:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And it doesn't include the preposterous story of him kidnapping Queen Wilhelmina. --41.151.21.98 (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anton Mussert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]