Talk:Anup Pandalam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not relevant?[edit]

Mischellemougly would you mind explaining how the section your removed is not relevant? [1] [2] [3] [4] and [5] JeraxmoirašŸ‰ (talk) 06:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that section is not directly involved with the subject , The controversy was with the actor Bala and the producer Unni Mukundan and not with the subject in this article. He is just a minor part of it. So its irrelevant to add that section and it will violate the NPOV policy Mischellemougly (talk) 06:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reasoning in your edit summary and here are contrasting. The main subject of the five sources above is Anup Pandalam. Please stop removing sourced information before reaching a consensus. JeraxmoirašŸ‰ (talk) 07:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He is not a minor part of it as he is the only one who has provided clarification, stating that he believes everyone has been paid. How does this violate NPOV? Please explain. Fyi, we have WP:BLPBALANCE. JeraxmoirašŸ‰ (talk) 07:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]