Talk:Apokolips

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 August 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 24 August 2020.

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Apokolips 2===[edit]

this article and most other articles containing "earth 2" mention an apokolips 2. That is simply wrong. It's the same apokolips, as it has been made very clear that in the new 52 apokolips is in a different dimension and has invaded and even destroyed several earths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.101.184 (talk) 04:41, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sections?[edit]

This article is long enough that some sections seem indicated. I don't have much knowledge of the subject, so I can't do it myself very well, but it would help to break things up. -Phoenixrod 05:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where the article gets the statement that Apokolips is a "galaxy-sized planet". Even in a science-fiction setting such a thing is an absurdity.

Agreed, and I've removed it, but I woudn't be surprised to learn such an absurd statement had appeared in the comics at some point. Daibhid C 13:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Map apokolips.jpg[edit]

Image:Map apokolips.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Kingdom Come it is revealed that Darkseid's...[edit]

... Darkseid's what? This sentence is incomplete. 70.171.182.248 (talk) 06:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location[edit]

I always got the impression apokolips and new genesis is in the constellation orion. Can someone confirm this? Where are the dominion from btw? Almerac? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.42.105 (talk) 03:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apokolips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070124230956/http://www.mykey3000.com/cosmicteams/cosmic/n.html to http://www.mykey3000.com/cosmicteams/cosmic/n.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]