Talk:Apollo 15/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Apostrophe

Did they really leave out an apostrophe from the plaque? JMcC 07:47, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Photograph of Dave Scott's spacesuit

Sorry, I just have a question to ask- is there any photographer willing to go to the National Air and Space Museum to snap a better framed photo of the display? I've just been to the discussion page on this photo's eligibility as a featured photo, and I agreed that the photo was oddly cropped and angled. But I still really, really like it, so if there is a better photo out there, it'd be great if somebody could upload it! Thanks! .onion 01:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Boeing mfg of the SII

This article stated that Boeing was the developer of the Lunar Rover, which is fine, but it also said they were the contractor for the Saturn V second stage (SII) which is incorrect. The correct manufacturer of the SII was North American Aircraft. True that they were ultimately purchased by Boeing, but I think better to stay true to history of the day. At the time of its creation, it was North American. Donboy2k 21:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

U of M Graduates

It's my undersanding all 3 crewmen were University of Michigan grads, not sure where to source this or how exactly to insert this tidbit. Does anyone know if this was unique? (i.e. can any other school claim an entire crew of alums?)

Almost - Dave Scott is a Texas Military Academy and MIT graduate, and was given an honorary degree by U of M after the mission. --Jkonrath 17:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually, Scott was also a U of M grad, not just honorary. He went there for a year before attending West Point - as noted on his own Wiki page. SpaceHistory101 (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Bondarenko

There was some discussion of 'Russian Cosmonauts.' PEOPLE: RUSSIA DID NOT HAVE A SPACE PROGRAM OR COSMONAUTS UNTIL 1991 OR SO. BEFORE THAT, they were SOVIET. In this case, the error is particularly egregious because it contains a direct reference to fallen cosmonaut Bondarenko, who was UKRAINIAN, NOT RUSSIAN. The proper term for all cosmonauts, armies, etc before 1991 is SOVIET. This is why "USSR" (CCCP) not "Russsia" was painted on the rockets. The only time using 'Russian' might be ok is in some context where you might in a parallel discussion use terms such as 'Californian' or 'Texan' when talking about some specific subset of astronauts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.7.28 (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Is this right?

"Apollo 15 was the ninth manned mission in the Apollo program and the fourth mission to land on the Moon". Was this the ninth manned mission? how could it be when there are only four to the moon? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chickenfeed9 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC).

Apollo 4-6 were unmanned test flights, Apollo 7-10 were manned test flights, Apollo 11-17 were manned lunar landing flights. Only 11, 12, 14, 15,16 and 17 actually landed. Matariel (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Inconsistency with the other Apollo mission pages

The Apollo 15 page stands out compared to the other mission pages, differing in page structure and is severely lacking in actual mission information. The additional information on hardware updates and mission change to the J mission profile is important, as is the context of the smuggled cargo, but none of the actual achievements of the mission itself are mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matariel (talk • contribs) 22:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I agree, the current page structure is very unorthodox. Can't help feeling that it would be better to merge all the separate pages into one that addresses the entire mission comprehensively. ChiZeroOne (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Comprehensive mission highlights section has been added below training/planning. Tyrol5 [Talk] 01:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Confusion over mission duration

The Apollo 15 Flight Journal gives the splashdown time which agrees with the one in our infobox, 53 seconds after the hour. Since the launch was (within one second) of 13:34:00 (UTC), 53 seconds is what the mission duration has to end with. The text under Return to Earth said 33 seconds; I don't know where that came from. (I couldn't find it on the Astronautix page or in the A15FJ.) Of course, what's 20 seconds in over 6 days? :-) JustinTime55 (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Apollo 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Apollo 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apollo 15. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720232257/https://history.nasa.gov/ap15fj/ to https://history.nasa.gov/ap15fj/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)