Talk:Aptilo Networks

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... Article is factual and provides citations for said facts. It does not promote the company by stating that it is "best" or "leading" and is short and to the point. I can't see how it could be misconstrued as 'promotional' --SimonInns (talk) 08:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated awards section[edit]

The awards section had several dead-links; I've removed the affected awards and added a new award with a secondary source citation (updated the section title to 'recent awards' to reflect the change — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonInns (talk • contribs) 13:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated History section[edit]

Replaced customer list with customers that can be cited using secondary sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonInns (talk • contribs) 13:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated bare URLs[edit]

All bare URLs updated to use the cite web template - and some citations update to more current information. Removed link rot banner as issue is now fixed — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonInns (talk • contribs) 13:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistic update[edit]

I performed a minor rewrite of the article to remove any expressions/wording which would not be considered 'industry wide' and rewrote sections in a more factual prose. If there are any suggestions for further improvement please leave me a note here on the talk page and I will consider them for inclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonInns (talk • contribs) 11:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]