Talk:Argonaut (submarine)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Disambiguation[edit]

As the wikipedia usage guidelines regarding disambiguation state...

There is no need to add disambiguation links to a page whose name already clearly distinguishes itself from the generic term. For example, Solaris (1972 film) is clearly about one specific movie and not about any of the many other meanings of "Solaris"

I added a disambiguation page since i don't think the title argonaut (submarine) makes it clear that this article is about the submarine class and not about individual submarines e.g. (argonaute).Larryisgood (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't renaming the page be a better solution? Ship/sub class articles usually have class in the name. - BilCat (talk) 14:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, how about Argonaut (submarine class)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryisgood (talk • contribs) 10:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]