This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
I have removed two sections, Formal Analysis and Historical Context, which were both largely unsourced. The first section read like a (well done and well-intentioned) school project on formal analysis. Both added little to a layperson's knowledge of the painting. The editor who apparently added much of the text for these sections, Yellowdolphin123, is no longer with the project. Mirrorparrot (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have to explain in the edit summary what you are doing and why. Otherwise it just looks like blanking for no reason. ...discospinstertalk 23:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Righto, gave it another try with edit summary. Thanks for the help. Mirrorparrot (talk) 23:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
