Talk:Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Stub, really?[edit]

The description has enough detail that a stub was highly unwarranted.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.204.195 (talk) 01:30, April 5, 2011

Please review WP:STUB. This article is well within the definition. In addition, your consistent removal of stub template from numerous articles without explanation may be considered as disruptive. elektrik SHOOS 02:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, different person here. I've read through the above link on stubs as well as the linked Croughton-London rule. It is my opinion that this is not, under the Croughton-London rule, a stub as there simply isn't much more that can be said about this topic. If any sort of decision is in consideration, I think that the stub tags should be remove on those grounds.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.74.7 (talk) 11:53, May 1, 2013