Talk:Asylum of the Daleks/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 14:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Ruby 2010/2013 14:32, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

As always, you've produced a great quality article. My comments are really just small nitpicks.

A prequel was released to iTunes, Zune, and Amazon Instant Video on 2 September 2012 for US and UK subscribers for the series -- I'm a little confused by the "subscribers for the series" part. Perhaps rewrite or clarify a little?
- I removed it because it only applied to iTunes. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"...coordinates to the planet Skaro" -- first mention of Skaro needs a wikilink; same for Amy and Rory
- Done. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just an observation (no need to change anything): the Daleks stated that don't want to kill the insane Daleks because of what they sense as beautiful, but are willing to destroy the entire planet? I saw the episode, but didn't realize how these two things seemingly contradict each other. Moffat, hmmm...
- I haven't seen it in a while either, but from what I understand they had not (in the past) destroyed the unusable Daleks because of "beauty", which has become a problem and now are forced to destroy them in this episode because of the breach in the force field; otherwise insane Daleks would roam about the galaxy without their control. They consider it a dishonor, though, so call up the Doctor to do it (on what's basically a suicide mission). Should I clarify that? Glimmer721 ^talk 21:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I think it's fine as is. Ruby 2010/2013 04:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcast and reception: I would change 14 August to 14 August 2012, and then remove "2012" from 1 September (i.e. establish the year earlier in the paragraph)
- Done. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More to come! Ruby 2010/2013 21:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing; in advance, I just want to say that this week is going to be pretty busy. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After another read through, I think the article is good to go. Its citations are reliable and well-formatted, the article is comprehensive, and the image looks fine. Well done! Were you planning on bringing The Eleventh Hour to FA soon? If so, let me know as I'd be happy to help review it (when I'm back from vacation in June, that is). :) Ruby 2010/2013 04:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]