Talk:Aura (Asia album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aura (Asia album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Opinion and speculative sentence[edit]

'The sound of Aura can be described as radio-friendly but the album failed to chart in the US[3] and didn't perform well in Britain, reaching only No. 160.[4] This was mainly due to the label that went broke within a year of the album release' ....... The last 1/2 of that is completely opinion and conjecture. I changed that part to 'it may have been partly due to ...'.

To say otherwise assumes the record would have been in the top 10 had the record label not been broke. That is non-neutral. - Darrien — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.96.202.47 (talk) 06:17, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]