Talk:Axial engine

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Closely resembles axial piston pump[edit]

See my comments on Talk:Axial piston pump. SGJ 12:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why no mention of Palmer Dynacam?[edit]

http://web.archive.org/web/20050208124221/www.dynacam.com/Index.htm

Palmer Dynacam was thought to have been bought out by AVEC, however, the purchase contracts were completely breached by AVEC and the $10 million that was owed to the original founders was never paid. http://www.axialvectorengine.com/

AVEC has stopped all usage by Palmer of the DynaCam name and thus even in the web archive the files are not available. The only thing won by AVEC in the lawsuit was the name Dyna-Cam, the Dyna-Cam website, and the agreement by the Palmers not to openly criticize the AVEC efforts online. The AVEC group wanted the technology and Dyna-Cam story to help sell the AVEC public stock. To date no engine resembling the original Dyna-Cam design has ever been produced by the AVEC group. (information valid as of April, 2004, submitted August, 2011)

Why no mention of this style of engine on ICE page?[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_combustion_engine

Just wondering-

maybe because the author didn't know anything about them. Don't forget RCV engines!!Petebutt (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original engine[edit]

The Blazers not only had the original design, they built the first engine approximately 5 or 6 years prior to selling the designs to Herrmann. I have all documentation supporting this along with the original engine. The cast iron engine that Axial Vector has is the one actually built years after the Blazer engine.

Dennis Bleser....(our last name was changed from Blazer to Bleser) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.118.132 (talk) 06:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "The small-end bearing of a traditional connecting rod, one of the most problematic bearings in a traditional engine," is not true. Engineerfarm (talk) 02:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Wobble plate engine" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wobble plate engine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 31#Wobble plate engine until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 04:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]