Talk:Bến Tre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Accurate?[edit]

Why does this entry not comport with Michael Miller's statement, which is found as an external link at the bottom of the page? Miller's story is totally different, and he includes the name and address of another soldier who he claims substantiates his first-hand account. Nicmart (talk) 02:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Have edited the page to reflect this, and added a source for the skeptical view.BobFromBrockley (talk) 13:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

skewed article[edit]

This article gives a lot of space to one quotation. The section on the Vietnam war ought to actually say what happened in the town during the Tet Offensive, as this is quite notable. There must also be other things about the town that ought to go into an encyclopedia article. Am adding a link at the end of the article to the local government's website history section; this and other sources must provide more information that would benefit the article.BobFromBrockley (talk) 13:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the whole discussion regarding this quote is wrong. I believe the quote comes from an enlisted Marine who was interviewed by American newscasters very early on in the war in 1965, and the quote does not refer to Ben Tre at all. I remember seeing the newscast. Peter Arnette may have picked up on this quote later to support his unfavorable view of the war, but he was not responsible for reporting it originally.Daniel Sparkman (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning ce work on article as part of GOCE[edit]

I've begun trying to clean up article.Sprinkler21 (talk) 03:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Sprinkler21[reply]

Deleted this: Its classification changed from town to city on 11 August 2009. Tried to find verifiable source with no luck. Sprinkler21 (talk) 02:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Sprinkler21[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Vinh Long which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bến Tre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cao Bằng which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:48, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bến Tre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam War[edit]

I removed some irrelevant discussion about some quote that's barely relevant to the topic that's taking up more than half the content of the article. This irrelevant emphasis is a systemic bias that we should avoid. DHN (talk) 01:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]